FP Article
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
FP Article
SaraD Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:34 pm
FP Article Draught
'CPF: Putting Your Future in Your Hands'
Foreign Policy Debate
At the CPF we KNOW that war IS profitable! ALL war is profitable for an economy. Let me explain the 'cycle':
A. War needs weapons and food so arms and food companies sell more!
B. They employ more people who get payed more!
C. They pay for more food and weapons!
D. The eGovernment takes a cut/tax from ALL transactions so their income rises!
E. The eGovernment funds the MUs who continue the war!
Therefore the Canadian Progressive Front wishes to engage ALL Parties, MUs and citizens in an eNational debate on what our future direction of Foreign Policy should be.
We wish therefore to make the following observations as a prelude:
A. We at the CPF, along with all eCanada and our allies, rejoiced when former President Aeriala and our forces, with allied support, stormed London. We KNEW however that it was untenable.
B. We recognise that, barring a 'baby boom' for either side, the eUK war is unwinnable and welcome peace with eUK.
The 'Next' Problem
After eUK ceasfire eCanada has three choices:
1. To sit tight and deploy 'mobile forces' in support of our allies, where and when needed, or via MPP when needed:
This is a 'safe' option in a way. However a large mobile force running all over the place would deprive eCanada of workers and the economy would drop. MPPs may be the best option here but this would need prioritising with Eden and Terra HQs.
2. To go after resources, via swaps with eUSA and along the lines of the Addy Lawrence plan of an Asian expansion:
Certainly extra resources boosts our economy and eUSA swaps are perhaps fine, if they were not being invaded. The Addy Asian plan requires many swap throughs for us to get to a hostile enation, presuming we shall not attack allies.
3. To secure our frontiers in conjunction with allies:
At present we are not threatened from Asia: eUSA is partly occupied as is most of eFrance by One forces. This may be the most dangerous option and offer least reward except in terms of gratitude from allies. It is perhaps doable if eRussia could be convinced to help and perhaps an eChina through eUSA option.
Of course it is likely that we have missed some options that YOU, your Party, or your MU see: We welcome other options and suggestions from any and everyone, be you President or just started!
The Canadian Progressive Front will host an IRC debate on 'Future Foreign Policy' on ...... You are also welcome to continue the debate in articles and on our forums at https://praetorhq.canadian-forum.com/ Naturaly we welcome all who wish join us and help influence the debate and shape their own and eCanadas future!
CPF: Putting Your Future in Your Hands
Needs a few more pics but what you think?
'CPF: Putting Your Future in Your Hands'
Foreign Policy Debate
At the CPF we KNOW that war IS profitable! ALL war is profitable for an economy. Let me explain the 'cycle':
A. War needs weapons and food so arms and food companies sell more!
B. They employ more people who get payed more!
C. They pay for more food and weapons!
D. The eGovernment takes a cut/tax from ALL transactions so their income rises!
E. The eGovernment funds the MUs who continue the war!
Therefore the Canadian Progressive Front wishes to engage ALL Parties, MUs and citizens in an eNational debate on what our future direction of Foreign Policy should be.
We wish therefore to make the following observations as a prelude:
A. We at the CPF, along with all eCanada and our allies, rejoiced when former President Aeriala and our forces, with allied support, stormed London. We KNEW however that it was untenable.
B. We recognise that, barring a 'baby boom' for either side, the eUK war is unwinnable and welcome peace with eUK.
The 'Next' Problem
After eUK ceasfire eCanada has three choices:
1. To sit tight and deploy 'mobile forces' in support of our allies, where and when needed, or via MPP when needed:
This is a 'safe' option in a way. However a large mobile force running all over the place would deprive eCanada of workers and the economy would drop. MPPs may be the best option here but this would need prioritising with Eden and Terra HQs.
2. To go after resources, via swaps with eUSA and along the lines of the Addy Lawrence plan of an Asian expansion:
Certainly extra resources boosts our economy and eUSA swaps are perhaps fine, if they were not being invaded. The Addy Asian plan requires many swap throughs for us to get to a hostile enation, presuming we shall not attack allies.
3. To secure our frontiers in conjunction with allies:
At present we are not threatened from Asia: eUSA is partly occupied as is most of eFrance by One forces. This may be the most dangerous option and offer least reward except in terms of gratitude from allies. It is perhaps doable if eRussia could be convinced to help and perhaps an eChina through eUSA option.
Of course it is likely that we have missed some options that YOU, your Party, or your MU see: We welcome other options and suggestions from any and everyone, be you President or just started!
The Canadian Progressive Front will host an IRC debate on 'Future Foreign Policy' on ...... You are also welcome to continue the debate in articles and on our forums at https://praetorhq.canadian-forum.com/ Naturaly we welcome all who wish join us and help influence the debate and shape their own and eCanadas future!
CPF: Putting Your Future in Your Hands
Needs a few more pics but what you think?
SaraD- Posts : 29
Join date : 2010-11-28
Re: FP Article
Funky_Hum24n Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:52 pm
For the third option on what we should do after the UK, you're missing what exactly we would do. I assume it involves attacking new ONE countries directly with coordination with such countries as Ireland, Russia, France, the Netherlands, Germany and the US.
Also, for now we are the New Canadian Progressive Front/nCPF. I recognize it was pretty much an arbitrary decision made by Aeriala after we moved away from the disaster that was Teneo Fidelis Dignitas so I will try to remember to bring it up either in the forum or in the new in-game thread. You could also use the party logo/emblem/flag I use in my articles if you want to.
Also, for now we are the New Canadian Progressive Front/nCPF. I recognize it was pretty much an arbitrary decision made by Aeriala after we moved away from the disaster that was Teneo Fidelis Dignitas so I will try to remember to bring it up either in the forum or in the new in-game thread. You could also use the party logo/emblem/flag I use in my articles if you want to.
Last edited by Funky_Hum24n on Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
Funky_Hum24n- Posts : 382
Join date : 2010-07-30
Location : EST -
Re: FP Article
SaraD Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:13 pm
One the 'our policy' which you raise first I agree with you opinion that dismantling the ePolish Empire, in eUSA and eFrance, SHOULD be our task -evidently in conjunction with allies. I am not sure we should state OUR conclusions though when trying to start a debate/attract members.
As for Party name etc: We are evidently NOT 'new' - we are an old and honourable Party and imo we would be better re-instating the 'old name' and Blue Moose logo and using our heritage. 'New Labour' in the UK just meant 'more lies'...
However you are PP (yep I was the first to vote today for you) and I accept your judgement on these matters.
As for Party name etc: We are evidently NOT 'new' - we are an old and honourable Party and imo we would be better re-instating the 'old name' and Blue Moose logo and using our heritage. 'New Labour' in the UK just meant 'more lies'...
However you are PP (yep I was the first to vote today for you) and I accept your judgement on these matters.
SaraD- Posts : 29
Join date : 2010-11-28
Updated FP
SaraD Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:29 am
The Mouse that Broke the Camels back (Article name)
Subtitle:
We at the Canadian Progressive Front have both welcomed and been deeply worried by recent Foreign Policy developments:
A. The eUK War Ended
We regarded this war as futile and geared by a self interested circle of power elitism: War needs weapons and food so arms and food companies sell more! -> They employ more people who get payed more! -> They pay for more food and weapons! -> The eGovernment takes a cut/tax from ALL transactions so their income rises! -> The eGovernment funds the MUs who continue the war!
While this war kept the wheels of self interest and the economy running in both countries what is the point long term if it couldn't be won? It progresses eCanada, nor our allies, no further. Rather, we thought, eUK should return to her natural alliance alongside eCanada and eUSA and we would fully support the setting up of a 'propaganda unit' with this in mind.
With our Bros to the south half occupied the eUK war was surely a side show and we welcome the hard work of the MoFa Ethel, and the Addy Lawrence Administration as a whole, to end this!
B. The Chattering Elite and ONE Suggestions
We at Canadian Progressive Front were alarmed to hear of the leaked suggestion, apparently derived from Congressmen, that we betray our allies by joining ONE. Ladies and Gentlemen we are at war with ONE, unless it has escaped your notice; such a suggestion is nothing less than sedition! The Congressman who even suggests such an idea should be publicly hung, drawn and quartered!
NEVER let eCanada suffer the same infamy as eUK who of old were 'bought' for a hospital by eHungary. Was the price worth it? The Blue Moose says: "NO price is worth OUR HONOUR!!!"
In this regard we are concerned with Addy Lawrences new suggestion of a new “The Brolliance”: Let us NOT form ever smaller alliances when we are already outnumbered and out gunned but rather increase the effectiveness of what we have! Why shouldn't Terra and Eden form a Combined Command where global priorities can be set?
C. The ePolish War
The People of the Blue Moose welcome the recent vote in Congress to make ePoland a Natural Enemy. The fact that this motion was brought by our own Congressman, Wilhelm Gunter, makes no odds but says a great deal about the loyalty of our Party.
Now this war is NOT going to be easy and we can expect setbacks (although we are winning in Minnesota as I write). We are NOT an 'esuper-power' and ePoland is possibly the greatest monster since the great days of eRomania. Does this mean we should not attack? The Blue Moose says: "Never!!!!! Though we be but a mouse we have the heart of a lion!!"
Indeed while this war may at first seem destined to defeat how many regions can the ePolish behemoth hold down in oppression at once? We welcome the entry of eRussia into the war and urge eFrance and eGermany to concentrate on liberating their regions. Idealy this should be done on a grand scale with a 'Grand Plan' under a Combined Command. (Can someone please tell me who's great idea it was to have eCroatia relocate to eMexico? Why isn't an MPP enough?)
D. The Future
We at the CPF will soon be releasing a series of articles and hosting weekly debates on eCanadian future policy. We believe eCanada IS not a place for elitist cliques to run our policy with their credit cards and business conglomerates. We welcome ALL true eCanadians and allies to our debates. The Blue Moose has slept too long we shall now act to put your future in your hands in future. We shall kick this off with an article and debate on 'The Duties of a Congressman' /Lady.
It is YOUR eCanada: It is our Honour!
CPF: Putting Your Future in YOUR Hands!
Subtitle:
Blue Moose: YOUR Foreign Policy
We at the Canadian Progressive Front have both welcomed and been deeply worried by recent Foreign Policy developments:
A. The eUK War Ended
We regarded this war as futile and geared by a self interested circle of power elitism: War needs weapons and food so arms and food companies sell more! -> They employ more people who get payed more! -> They pay for more food and weapons! -> The eGovernment takes a cut/tax from ALL transactions so their income rises! -> The eGovernment funds the MUs who continue the war!
While this war kept the wheels of self interest and the economy running in both countries what is the point long term if it couldn't be won? It progresses eCanada, nor our allies, no further. Rather, we thought, eUK should return to her natural alliance alongside eCanada and eUSA and we would fully support the setting up of a 'propaganda unit' with this in mind.
With our Bros to the south half occupied the eUK war was surely a side show and we welcome the hard work of the MoFa Ethel, and the Addy Lawrence Administration as a whole, to end this!
B. The Chattering Elite and ONE Suggestions
We at Canadian Progressive Front were alarmed to hear of the leaked suggestion, apparently derived from Congressmen, that we betray our allies by joining ONE. Ladies and Gentlemen we are at war with ONE, unless it has escaped your notice; such a suggestion is nothing less than sedition! The Congressman who even suggests such an idea should be publicly hung, drawn and quartered!
NEVER let eCanada suffer the same infamy as eUK who of old were 'bought' for a hospital by eHungary. Was the price worth it? The Blue Moose says: "NO price is worth OUR HONOUR!!!"
In this regard we are concerned with Addy Lawrences new suggestion of a new “The Brolliance”: Let us NOT form ever smaller alliances when we are already outnumbered and out gunned but rather increase the effectiveness of what we have! Why shouldn't Terra and Eden form a Combined Command where global priorities can be set?
C. The ePolish War
The People of the Blue Moose welcome the recent vote in Congress to make ePoland a Natural Enemy. The fact that this motion was brought by our own Congressman, Wilhelm Gunter, makes no odds but says a great deal about the loyalty of our Party.
Now this war is NOT going to be easy and we can expect setbacks (although we are winning in Minnesota as I write). We are NOT an 'esuper-power' and ePoland is possibly the greatest monster since the great days of eRomania. Does this mean we should not attack? The Blue Moose says: "Never!!!!! Though we be but a mouse we have the heart of a lion!!"
Indeed while this war may at first seem destined to defeat how many regions can the ePolish behemoth hold down in oppression at once? We welcome the entry of eRussia into the war and urge eFrance and eGermany to concentrate on liberating their regions. Idealy this should be done on a grand scale with a 'Grand Plan' under a Combined Command. (Can someone please tell me who's great idea it was to have eCroatia relocate to eMexico? Why isn't an MPP enough?)
D. The Future
We at the CPF will soon be releasing a series of articles and hosting weekly debates on eCanadian future policy. We believe eCanada IS not a place for elitist cliques to run our policy with their credit cards and business conglomerates. We welcome ALL true eCanadians and allies to our debates. The Blue Moose has slept too long we shall now act to put your future in your hands in future. We shall kick this off with an article and debate on 'The Duties of a Congressman' /Lady.
It is YOUR eCanada: It is our Honour!
CPF: Putting Your Future in YOUR Hands!
SaraD- Posts : 29
Join date : 2010-11-28
Re: FP Article
SaraD Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:33 am
Title: nCPF Foreign Policy Debate
nCPF: Putting Your Future in Your Hands!
As our Party President Funky Hum24n announced 5-6 days ago "On December 7th I, with the rest of the nCPF present, will be hosting a debate at #eCan on Wedneday at 16:00 eRep time on the direction of eCanada's foreign policy."
We at the nCPF want to challenge YOU to come up with a future policy: It's YOUR country after all! ALL are invited to attend or can leave suggestions and ideas below. NO idea is off limits!
Suggestions
A. Should eCnada join ONE? If so why? What would be the implications?
B. Should eCanada call a truce in the war with ePoland? Why? Perhaps we should concentrate more on getting our full set of resources? Again, what would be the implications?
C. Perhaps eCanada should resume the war with eUK? Or maybe attack ePoland in eFrance? Possible re-open the idea of Asian conquests?
D. What of Alliances? A recent Poll suggested most wished to remain as members of Eden and Terra but Addy Lawrence has has a idea about a 'New Brolliance'? Is this a good idea? Why is it/isn't it?
These are merely suggestions but the debate is YOURS! It is YOUR eCanada and therefore YOUR ideas that matter!
Leave a comment; attend the debate or post a comment in our Party Forums here: https://praetorhq.canadian-forum.com/
The nCPF: Putting Your Future in Your Hands!
nCPF: Putting Your Future in Your Hands!
As our Party President Funky Hum24n announced 5-6 days ago "On December 7th I, with the rest of the nCPF present, will be hosting a debate at #eCan on Wedneday at 16:00 eRep time on the direction of eCanada's foreign policy."
We at the nCPF want to challenge YOU to come up with a future policy: It's YOUR country after all! ALL are invited to attend or can leave suggestions and ideas below. NO idea is off limits!
Suggestions
A. Should eCnada join ONE? If so why? What would be the implications?
B. Should eCanada call a truce in the war with ePoland? Why? Perhaps we should concentrate more on getting our full set of resources? Again, what would be the implications?
C. Perhaps eCanada should resume the war with eUK? Or maybe attack ePoland in eFrance? Possible re-open the idea of Asian conquests?
D. What of Alliances? A recent Poll suggested most wished to remain as members of Eden and Terra but Addy Lawrence has has a idea about a 'New Brolliance'? Is this a good idea? Why is it/isn't it?
These are merely suggestions but the debate is YOURS! It is YOUR eCanada and therefore YOUR ideas that matter!
Leave a comment; attend the debate or post a comment in our Party Forums here: https://praetorhq.canadian-forum.com/
The nCPF: Putting Your Future in Your Hands!
SaraD- Posts : 29
Join date : 2010-11-28
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|